Problem.

[drake]

hi guys, it's a little bit that I don't write anymore mainly from demoralization. . .
tell me if you sw, especially 2016, works properly or you also have "problems" dependent on graphics.
Lately every day makes me something strange and also very worrying, one of these things didn't even support me. but let us leave and come to today's trouble.
I was modeling a structure in part multibody and I make my usual changes since I am designing it. I realize at some point that makes me see a body that shouldn't be there. I'll attach pictures to make you understand the problem that I just don't understand. . .
as you can see there is a "overlapping" of profiles.. .Here you can see the word "curious that stays with me." .The functions I did to create those bodies were these.
creation of structural profiles. . .cut profiles in correspondence of the soul of the ipe with the short/extended command.. .moving the body...the result is what you see in the first image, clearly wrong. I have regenerated and edited several times these functions but always get the same result.
I've always worked this way for years and I've never seen things like that. lately the graphics have big problems, also described here in the forum several times and not only by me. Do you guys do weird things like this, or am I the predestined? ?
I wrote this to have a confrontation with you beyond my specific "problem".
Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

It seems to me that something like that happened to me when I used 2016, but it causes neurons to scrape I can't be more precise.
I guess you've already checked in the cutting range that aren't two superimposed bodies.
just to make proof of the shelving which are: instead of making two sketch lines for the tube fan one and instead of making the shearing by means of the planes (which you are obliged to use when you use elements that are not structural members) do it by means of the bodies removing both spuns to allow extension

 

[drake]

bye
in the distinct he creates two profiles and that which left me more puzzled. It creates them and therefore could also mistake on the total weights of a job. Now I have noticed, but it is not said that one always notices. clear that with the hind of the then the line could be made unique and not double, but also this comes from changes of the ongoing project and is not always easy "to know first".
Why do you think cutting it using the structural bodies is better instead of using the plans? I usually use plans regardless of the bodies being structural members and not.
I add that I also tried to edit the function moves by making the copy and so the bodies become 3. but only of the lower one, while for the upper one is all correct. editing again and removing the check on copy back as before, wrong below and corrected above.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

that of making a line is to try them all how to say...
check the amount of the bodies before moving, perhaps the double depends on that extension (which by the way in your case does not serve anything). in such case you should restore the functions one by one until the wheel comes out and facilitation analysis.

 

[drake]

you move it is not the problem, because suspending it the separate gives me two bodies. Now, since I have to make other changes, I run through the functions and see what makes the double and then I let you know. . .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in fact I wrote to verify the quantity of the bodies premium of the function moves that I do not think it is the problem at all.
may depend on the attachment/extension and its extension.
verify the amount of the bodies before and after the commotion/extension.

 

[drake]

exact I verified that the problem was exactly the permissible extension that made it create double profile.
He doesn't. Sometimes the extension allows I leave it without even noticing when I see that the cut is correct. From now on, I'll be careful and take it out when it's superfluous. It remains the fact that it should not.
Thank you.