stefanobruno
Guest
I don't understand. I'm still having trouble.
I attach the rows of rhino5, obtained from the stp converted by inventor and not further treated.
I attach the rows of rhino5, obtained from the stp converted by inventor and not further treated.
mariuss.r
Guest
I'm sorry. I'll explain.
importing your steps into rhino there are no problems, except that only "holy support" is recognized as a valid closed polysurface (so a solid ).
the other piece "motor support" is recognized as valid but not closed polysurface (it is not a solid).
When importing your steps in pro/e 2001 problems occur on both pieces and in the same points, see the image highlighting the edges (yellow) with shredding errors that cause the unclosing of the surface union.
I think it has to do with the absolute tolerance set in the cad with which the pieces were originally made.
Attachments
stefanobruno
Guest
I confirm, he says that to me too.
in the analysis of open edges, rhino5 does not report any.
the rhino file "motor support ", in inventor is opened as surface, sign of the presence of open edges.
the open edges however find them in the thread, made with a helid that, probably, in the various conversions has deteriorated.
the fittings that pro/e sees as corrupt, inventor digested them as fresh water.
AutostuDent
Guest
therefore with the modification made by marius should be readable on any type of program?
@marius the files you have corrected I guess are those edited by stefano?
@marius the files you have corrected I guess are those edited by stefano?
mariuss.r
Guest
I would not be so optimistic
the interpretation of what's in a step file depends on both the program that creates it and what reads it.
But trying doesn't cost anything... Let us know
That's right. .
Last edited:
ROAR
Guest
Unfortunately or fortunately autodesk does not have the monopoly of the sw cad, no one would discover the faults of autocad in working in 3d
p.
I knew the facekos that appeared to me opening the two xmotorend steps and modified motor support with catia
ROAR
Guest
ROAR
Guest
the checkup that makes me create is more beautiful:
first
Good mariuss:finger:now I catch and I grow heartily thank you:
AutostuDent
Guest
@roar how?
stefanobruno
Guest
but it is not that here pieces are too simple for creocatiaproe, so the prog. gets tired and takes under the leg easy fittings waiting for the super complex ones? :36_1_18:
ROAR
Guest
in the sense that in the files prior to those of mariuss creo and catia they detected so many mistakes to correct, after in the files of mariuss these errors are gone, then anyway I do not tifo for no sw
AutostuDent
Guest
just another question you can convert via autocad 2014 step to .stl? (with a resolution of 0.01mm on "layer"? )
possibly yes, how?
edit
or better for a good 3d print with 0.1mm resolution which recommended value to use for facetres for proper conversion?
a'riedit
wanting to place the object in the positive octant so that it is vertical and perpendicular to the plane, there is any procedure to follow rather than go so "to the eye" ?
possibly yes, how?
edit
or better for a good 3d print with 0.1mm resolution which recommended value to use for facetres for proper conversion?
a'riedit
wanting to place the object in the positive octant so that it is vertical and perpendicular to the plane, there is any procedure to follow rather than go so "to the eye" ?
AutostuDent
Guest
ok solved everything except a correct repositioning of the object. . .
AutostuDent
Guest
Excuse me if I resume the discussion,
only after printing the piece in 3d I realized that during conversion to .stl of files modified by marius, a threaded hole is literally lost, visible in this screenshot of how it should be.
I used facetres set to: 10
I set maximum smoothness: 4 (in the mesh setup)
I used the command: stlout (here might have been a problem? ! )
in fact immediately after I was asked to select the object, and remained the open row.. I wrote yes in that line and passed to the next,
where he asked me if to save in binary file and I did yes (s) also they... (maybe I should have given the final selection command??? What is that? )
However I attach the image of the hole that has not been converted.
(the basic polygons are set on parallelepiped with all values 3) (using always autocad 2014)
only after printing the piece in 3d I realized that during conversion to .stl of files modified by marius, a threaded hole is literally lost, visible in this screenshot of how it should be.
I used facetres set to: 10
I set maximum smoothness: 4 (in the mesh setup)
I used the command: stlout (here might have been a problem? ! )
in fact immediately after I was asked to select the object, and remained the open row.. I wrote yes in that line and passed to the next,
where he asked me if to save in binary file and I did yes (s) also they... (maybe I should have given the final selection command??? What is that? )
However I attach the image of the hole that has not been converted.
(the basic polygons are set on parallelepiped with all values 3) (using always autocad 2014)
Attachments
AutostuDent
Guest
for completeness of information I also add the inquisitive .stl file.
I hope someone can help me solve the above.
View attachment Disegno1.rar
I hope someone can help me solve the above.
View attachment Disegno1.rar
alexix
Guest
Bye to all,
I need to change the format of a file from .sldprt to .step to be able to insert it into a layout.
Unfortunately I don't have solidworks software.
Can anyone help me?
How do I post the file link on this blog?
I need to change the format of a file from .sldprt to .step to be able to insert it into a layout.
Unfortunately I don't have solidworks software.
Can anyone help me?
How do I post the file link on this blog?
alexix
Guest
forward a link to download the solidworks file.
https://app.box.com/s/69accfipgy7fh72pcmg3m98mo5prowfbPlease... some pious soul that can convert it into step!
Thank you.
https://app.box.com/s/69accfipgy7fh72pcmg3m98mo5prowfbPlease... some pious soul that can convert it into step!
Thank you.
stefanobruno
Guest
I have the converted stp, if you send me a private message with your email address and I send you a message with wetransfer.
Bye.
Bye.