drake
Guest
I just want to tell you that I know exactly what I say, when I take what I say.work in a company where nx has been used for a long time.
I started using it from version 7.5, from scratch.
in 1 year of non-intensive use however, I have come to know more functions and best practices than people who use it since 1996.
not because I am a phenomenon. at all.
I have often heard myself say what you say here and in my company reality I understood and I realized why.
First of all there is a fault contest: on the one hand the company does not promote frequent courses but above all, those few that are made are of low level, generic and little focused on certain topics.
On the other hand the majority of my colleagues hardly with spontaneous curiosity deepen the modeling techniques exploiting the advantage of the enhancement that the sw over time earns (and that the company paid and paid fragrantly for the software granting policies ).
so I think it is necessary caution when it states 'how to say that a software and more performing than a previous version': in these cases there would be a question:, but how well and efficiently do I use/know?
Of course, they have built the pyramids without the means available today, but to say that between now and 3000 years ago of differences and improvements there is no to have been I seem a little reductive especially when (and I make a trivial example but I think clear) there are people who answer me that make a hole with a feature hole and then apply the feature symbolic thread or use the same feature with activated the threaded hole function where in one click you get better.
so before speaking we should consider how much we are trained and informed (and this reasoning applies to me on every aspect, both working and not).
We will arrive (and the first steps are being taken) to have software capable of developing models almost independently, starting from data and conditions charged by the user (generative design) and probably going beyond.
I, yes, enjoy when I have a new version of a sw that I use (it is an os or other) because I'm hungry to know the news, also hoping that these improve my daily work making it pleasant.
And if I can't find them alone, I'll find them.
sincerely until now, for me, it was so and I continue to discover 'figaggini'.[emoji57]for the policies of sale of the sw instead, well... they are puzzled.
but what to say... and what to do.. .
sent by my col-l29 using tapatalk
also here in the forum for a long time I have reported my impressions that come out of the everyday work. work that development from free professional who pays software, assistance, courses and imprecations daily. ah I forgot hardware, more and more often x because unlike what moms say softwarehouse, their products are increasingly greedy of resources. This is more reasoned with the last Bill's pupil doing the good and bad weather, without you deciding anything.
how not to notice that the software is released only for profit by the manufacturer?? profit without any respect for its customers. This is the serious thing, not the grievance. every year in the same way, so much so that we all never use the latest releases, before they go out service packs that make them more stable and safe. I don't think it's hard to understand that they're taking x-necks, because they figured out how to do so much bussiness. It may be that some sofware go better than others, but I don't think there are so many differences.