Exatem
Guest
square official – discussions about World War II and its surroundings.
“The First World War explains the second, and it was actually the cause, as an event can cause another one.” this wrote a.j.p. taylor in the essay “original of the Second World War”, “Germany fought the second war to overturn the verdict of the first and to cancel the imposed.” Although some do not fully agree with this position, almost everyone agrees that the Second War is not explained without referring to the first.
Of course, the winners preferred to attribute to the expansionist myres of germany the cause of the outbreak of the great war as they then did for the second.
However, by analyzing the facts, perhaps reality cannot be reduced to such a simple and common explanation of why the world was overwhelmed for two consecutive times, and so short distance, by mass conflicts that caused millions of dead, injured, invalid.
who erased entire generations, who consumed enormous wealth by inflicting more suffering on humanity than any other previous event.
four years of conflict caused 10 million deaths and burned Europe, mesopotamia, africa and cina, north and south, east and west.
after twenty years, the same protagonists resurfaced on the same battlefields, causing the death of over 50 million people mostly civilians and leaving the world under no better conditions.
the increase in resources, wealth and population, resulting from the industrial revolution, had transformed the society of the xx century.
the world was connected by railways, roads, air and maritime routes, the "infrastructures" were born, schools, universities and above all armies, armies increasingly numerous and equipped with destructive means never seen before.
the combination of human ingenuity and industrial capacity made it possible to build weapons with which the armies would inflict huge losses.
sometimes these inventions were due to the case or the concaus of events apparently disconnected between them.
For example, hiram maxim had long been devoting himself to electrical engineering experiments when an American colleague told him: “to hell with your electricity! if you want to make a fortune, invent something that allows those European fools to kill each other faster” and the machine gun was born.
four were the factors that made possible the manufacture of new war machines:
- the diffusion of steam machines that will provide energy for industrial production.
- the development of the “American method” i.e. the production of interchangeal parts thanks to the use of the pantograph, which will allow the huge increase of the production in series (e.g. the dreyse needle rifle, was produced in 1847 in 10,000 pieces. the enfield built in only 1863, 100,370 rifles while the French will succeed three ances after producing 300,000 chassepot rifles.
- the bessemer converter furnace thanks to which the krupp foundries built their famous cannons.
- chemical applied to explosives with products capable of pushing bullets and bullets faster and further.
and when the weapons were applied the recovery of energy, on the battlefields appeared the machine guns and fast shooting guns capable of bringing death quickly and at a great distance.
We will try to talk about the conflict, causes and consequences by focusing on the technical innovations that accompanied the events and to do this, we will give the word to some officers, sub-officials or sailors, who with their stories, will guide us narrating the events from the point of observation "privileged" of workers.
are all imaginary characters, invented. but that tell stories true, really happened.
books, publications of all kinds that speak of World War II, are full of books from all over the world. hoped to be able to maintain objectivity and critical vision, we will stress in particular on the Italian war, on why we entered the war, with what expectations, with what results. I say “we” not by chance but in the hope that whoever wants to contribute, put his opinion available, keeping in the tracks of correctness and mutual respect even in the face of opposite opinions.
“The First World War explains the second, and it was actually the cause, as an event can cause another one.” this wrote a.j.p. taylor in the essay “original of the Second World War”, “Germany fought the second war to overturn the verdict of the first and to cancel the imposed.” Although some do not fully agree with this position, almost everyone agrees that the Second War is not explained without referring to the first.
Of course, the winners preferred to attribute to the expansionist myres of germany the cause of the outbreak of the great war as they then did for the second.
However, by analyzing the facts, perhaps reality cannot be reduced to such a simple and common explanation of why the world was overwhelmed for two consecutive times, and so short distance, by mass conflicts that caused millions of dead, injured, invalid.
who erased entire generations, who consumed enormous wealth by inflicting more suffering on humanity than any other previous event.
four years of conflict caused 10 million deaths and burned Europe, mesopotamia, africa and cina, north and south, east and west.
after twenty years, the same protagonists resurfaced on the same battlefields, causing the death of over 50 million people mostly civilians and leaving the world under no better conditions.
the increase in resources, wealth and population, resulting from the industrial revolution, had transformed the society of the xx century.
the world was connected by railways, roads, air and maritime routes, the "infrastructures" were born, schools, universities and above all armies, armies increasingly numerous and equipped with destructive means never seen before.
the combination of human ingenuity and industrial capacity made it possible to build weapons with which the armies would inflict huge losses.
sometimes these inventions were due to the case or the concaus of events apparently disconnected between them.
For example, hiram maxim had long been devoting himself to electrical engineering experiments when an American colleague told him: “to hell with your electricity! if you want to make a fortune, invent something that allows those European fools to kill each other faster” and the machine gun was born.
four were the factors that made possible the manufacture of new war machines:
- the diffusion of steam machines that will provide energy for industrial production.
- the development of the “American method” i.e. the production of interchangeal parts thanks to the use of the pantograph, which will allow the huge increase of the production in series (e.g. the dreyse needle rifle, was produced in 1847 in 10,000 pieces. the enfield built in only 1863, 100,370 rifles while the French will succeed three ances after producing 300,000 chassepot rifles.
- the bessemer converter furnace thanks to which the krupp foundries built their famous cannons.
- chemical applied to explosives with products capable of pushing bullets and bullets faster and further.
and when the weapons were applied the recovery of energy, on the battlefields appeared the machine guns and fast shooting guns capable of bringing death quickly and at a great distance.
We will try to talk about the conflict, causes and consequences by focusing on the technical innovations that accompanied the events and to do this, we will give the word to some officers, sub-officials or sailors, who with their stories, will guide us narrating the events from the point of observation "privileged" of workers.
are all imaginary characters, invented. but that tell stories true, really happened.
books, publications of all kinds that speak of World War II, are full of books from all over the world. hoped to be able to maintain objectivity and critical vision, we will stress in particular on the Italian war, on why we entered the war, with what expectations, with what results. I say “we” not by chance but in the hope that whoever wants to contribute, put his opinion available, keeping in the tracks of correctness and mutual respect even in the face of opposite opinions.