table and non-functional development

[xxfast]

Hello, everyone.
Would someone know how to tell me why when I make the table in swx I can't view the sheet development?
on the part file everything works regularly.

 

[eboss]

Hello, everyone.
Would someone know how to tell me why when I make the table in swx I can't view the sheet development?
on the part file everything works regularly.

can't view is not sufficiently clear?but the flat repetition view inserted it? or in the dx tree do you see the flat repetition view?

 

[xxfast]

can't view is not sufficiently clear?but the flat repetition view inserted it? or in the dx tree do you see the flat repetition view?

In the tree there is a view, but it is not flattened.
on the part everything works.View attachment 28516

 

[eboss]

In the tree there is a view, but it is not flattened.
on the part everything works.View attachment 28516

but are you sure if you go to the developed configuration the flat repetition is active?
If you want to attach the file I have 2012 but still I can open it.. .

 

[xxfast]

but are you sure if you go to the developed configuration the flat repetition is active?
If you want to attach the file I have 2012 but still I can open it.. .

Okay here's the file.
But then you tell me how you do if you can. :finger:
View attachment 28518

 

[eboss]

Okay here's the file.
But then you tell me how you do if you can. :finger:
View attachment 28518

from me it works correctly, try once inserted in the flat larynification table to click the dx button and see that the developed configuration is really active!

 

[xxfast]

from me it works correctly, try once inserted in the flat larynification table to click the dx button and see that the developed configuration is really active!

You mean from here?
I think it's okay.View attachment 28519with the configurations are not yet very hardware :redface:

 

[eboss]

You mean from here?
I think it's okay.View attachment 28519with the configurations are not yet very hardware :redface:

it would look exactly correct, feel close the table, deletes the configuration developed in the part and try to create it manually, the configuration developed and then insert it into the table.
Unfortunately all stations have been updated to swx 2012 and I can't try with 2011 and make you a practical example.

 

[xxfast]

it would look exactly correct, feel close the table, deletes the configuration developed in the part and try to create it manually, the configuration developed and then insert it into the table.
Unfortunately all stations have been updated to swx 2012 and I can't try with 2011 and make you a practical example.

I'll try...
If you could explain to me how I should do it would be the top.

 

[eboss]

I'll try...
If you could explain to me how I should do it would be the top.

so the flight tries to see if you can solve this way.
View attachment sviluppo.rar

 

[re_solidworks]

I'll try...
If you could explain to me how I should do it would be the top.

so the flight tries to see if you can solve this way.
View attachment 28522

or instead of deleting the configuration and doing it again you could:

activate development configuration
activate flattening
return to default configuration

Attached the modified video and file (in 2011)

Hi.

 

[xxfast]

Thank you, guys.
both solutions work, but re_ is the easiest.
Did I set the development configuration?

 

[eboss]

Thank you, guys.
both solutions work, but re_ is the easiest.
Did I set the development configuration?

generally the development configuration created by the table is already flattened. . .evidently something did not go as it had to if the development configuration was not flattened. . .
the important thing is that you found the solution :wink:

 

[xxfast]

generally the development configuration created by the table is already flattened. . .evidently something did not go as it had to if the development configuration was not flattened. . .
the important thing is that you found the solution :wink:

Okay, thank you.
As we have heard, you would tell me why when I get the sight flattened on the cartilage the fold lines always seem to me to be placed in bulk outside the cartilage : eek:

 

[re_solidworks]

Okay, thank you.
As we have heard, you would tell me why when I get the sight flattened on the cartilage the fold lines always seem to me to be placed in bulk outside the cartilage : eek:

probably is a problem related to the 0.0 service pack that would not even be installed. alternatively I think of the vga: is it certified?

 

[Mike1967]

Okay, thank you.
As we have heard, you would tell me why when I get the sight flattened on the cartilage the fold lines always seem to me to be placed in bulk outside the cartilage : eek:

I suggest you enable the flag "preview", in the property manager, while placing the view.
sometimes it is "sufficient" mad select the view and display it shaded and immediately after returning to "visible lines" to make everything reappear in the right place.
I did this in beta 2013 with the hope that it will be taken in soderation.

 

[xxfast]

I suggest you enable the flag "preview", in the property manager, while placing the view.
sometimes it is "sufficient" mad select the view and display it shaded and immediately after returning to "visible lines" to make everything reappear in the right place.
I did this in beta 2013 with the hope that it will be taken in soderation.

I tried but it doesn't work.
I usually develop it from palette, in the menu to the right.
Anyway, if it's a sw problem, it's all right, so we're getting in. :biggrin:

 

[xxfast]

Wait. .
seems that by selecting the development and then moving it up and down the screen, then release the mouse button by placing the view, everything works.

 

[Mike1967]

Wait. .
seems that by selecting the development and then moving it up and down the screen, then release the mouse button by placing the view, everything works.

Yes, indeed... It is depressing but it is so.
did you try to do as I wrote before (habilitate the flag...)?
I have done several tests and I can assure you that with the active flag the view is correct, but these are things I fan me turn the boxes anyway.
I also reported in beta 2013 and hope it is considered.
I also have implemented the normal cut on multiple bodies in sheet metal... But this is a secret... :biggrin:

 

[xxfast]

Yes, indeed... It is depressing but it is so.
did you try to do as I wrote before (habilitate the flag...)?
I have done several tests and I can assure you that with the active flag the view is correct, but these are things I fan me turn the boxes anyway.
I also reported in beta 2013 and hope it is considered.
I also have implemented the normal cut on multiple bodies in sheet metal... But this is a secret... :biggrin:

but if I insert the view from the palette as active the flag?
However, it's obvious, stay ahead...:finger: