Daniele-san
Guest
Hello.
a tip for gpu for ptc creo
nvidia geforce rtx 3070 ti What do you think?
Thank you.
a tip for gpu for ptc creo
nvidia geforce rtx 3070 ti What do you think?
Thank you.
TAURUS77
Guest
hi daniele-san, right these days I was taking a look at so much to stay a bit on the piece and don't dazzle me on the topic video cards.
I was very impressed by the amd rx 7900 xtx that in the specviewperf tests it cracks bad.
I link to a comparison with some professional vga
Last edited:
TAURUS77
Guest
add another conffronto with the top of professional nvidia rangeother comparison with the sixe gaming nvidia
gil
Guest
Maybe I'll be a little late. Unfortunately I have never found direct comparisons sensible in the professional field for video cards. Why do you miss the 3 series of nvidia instead of the 4 series, more recent?
However, the rtx 3070 can compare it to an amd7800xt at the price level. as a brute power the amd is superior. if then this results in performance would be to be evaluated. nvidia offers you rtx technology, for the hardware management of raytracing, but to use creo serve?
However, the rtx 3070 can compare it to an amd7800xt at the price level. as a brute power the amd is superior. if then this results in performance would be to be evaluated. nvidia offers you rtx technology, for the hardware management of raytracing, but to use creo serve?
df2001.98
Guest
viewport performance look at catia, solidworks, snx, creo, 3ds max & maya
techgage.com
Viewport Performance Look At CATIA, SolidWorks, SNX, Creo, 3ds Max...
We're taking a fresh look at the many workloads available in SPECviewperf. This time around, we're taking a much deeper look at subtest results, to gain a better understanding of how SVP's overall scores are generated. With the help of 28 GPUs, two resolutions, and 38 subtests, we have a lot of...
techgage.com
BFausto
Guest
Hello, daniele-san, I'm trying to answer you.
in July or changed the pc and the new one I set up it with a ryzen 7 7800x3d and nvidia 4070 (founders edition), trying to favor components of low energy consumption (a fan for the only liquid heat sink of the cpu throughout the pc).
the behavior with creo is not bad, assemblings of 600 parts (prints for plastic).
in July or changed the pc and the new one I set up it with a ryzen 7 7800x3d and nvidia 4070 (founders edition), trying to favor components of low energy consumption (a fan for the only liquid heat sink of the cpu throughout the pc).
the behavior with creo is not bad, assemblings of 600 parts (prints for plastic).
gil
Guest
this is a rare analysis, thanks for the link.viewport performance look at catia, solidworks, snx, creo, 3ds max & maya
Viewport Performance Look At CATIA, SolidWorks, SNX, Creo, 3ds Max...
We're taking a fresh look at the many workloads available in SPECviewperf. This time around, we're taking a much deeper look at subtest results, to gain a better understanding of how SVP's overall scores are generated. With the help of 28 GPUs, two resolutions, and 38 subtests, we have a lot of...
I suppose you should assess the performance taking into account that they are professional programs. ergo, it is not the search for the maximum fps generated what counts. I think that in the design when you arrive at 30fps you are fine, because it is quite static images or that you move slowly. for me what matters is
1) image loyalty, lack of artifacts
2) system stability without crash
3) the important is to reach those 30fps, with models as large as possible. but going beyond 60fps is quite useless.
4) Silence, because I don't use headphones with ball background music, and I don't want to stay 8 hours near a wheel that looks like a helicopter.
instead take a model and make it turn to the madness, to see if you generate 120 or 180 fps is pure theory. It is like saying that for the transport of heavy goods, a utilitarian car is better than a truck because the peak speed is higher, without taking into account the transportable mass.
TAURUS77
Guest
hi gil, I always thought specviewperf a reliable test since when a pc is unable to run the various tests gives you an error message and does not complete the test. It is normal that the more powerful the PC is better manages the whole not only the graphic compartment. time ago I tried one of the last versions of specvieperf on my vetusta workstation and the test of the platform that is a beast as heaviness also slowly turned is by this I realized that it was not yet time to change hardware as I hardly would have found cases limit as this test.
zwidow76
Guest
beyond that you are proposing gpu for vidogiochi.
it is enough one of 5 years ago for the amount of polygons that has 3d.
It's the cpu that has to make calculations in the parametrics not the graphics card.
it is enough one of 5 years ago for the amount of polygons that has 3d.
It's the cpu that has to make calculations in the parametrics not the graphics card.
gil
Guest
is the position expressed by you shipped for creo or even for other programs cad? can you post links to some tests that can refute your location?
zwidow76
Guest
It seems obvious to me.
Just look at the use of gpu and cpu on the pc while turning a 3d model, calm flat gpu.
and then throw a game and see that the gpu reactor is starting because it is being used. while the fans are almost lit first.
the amount of polygons and textures that are managed in the games is light years different than the models of cad. there are no textures, the ram is therefore little exploited.
I now have a gtx 1070 and manco turn the fans into creo with important assemblies. I also have other ws with professional high-end tabs but nothing changes, enough wasted.
ris 2560x1440
Last edited:
radio
Guest
I do not know him and I do not say anything about it. I use solid edge and gpu (professional card, not gaming) exploits it to the great, sees "work" more than 50% is the norm, and we would miss more with what costs.
I never used a gaming card on a ws cad and I can't tell if in that case the gpu, optimized to do another job, does not come into play with the cad.
I never used a gaming card on a ws cad and I can't tell if in that case the gpu, optimized to do another job, does not come into play with the cad.
gil
Guest
I do these trivial tests with my pc to see how the hardware turns out.
fast model of advance steel. you see the use of cpu and gpu to use paratically to zero. the first gpu you see in the task manger is the integral that I do not use, so ignore it to do so.
at some point I start turning the model, which is not particularly large.
Of course, it is not enough to fully exploit the hardware, but it is seen to rise both gpuche cpu to about 25/30%. so I use both.
Finally I launch a trivial render and here we see that the load is all towards the cpu. because autocad makes with that. does not have a modern engine that exploits the cores of the gpu that should be better.
I have no chance to do in-depth checks, I know how hardware works on a few programs. Now on the pc I have only advance and I certainly do not contract licenses for my personal benefit, so well be sharing your experiences.
balancing hardware components is always a source of doubt and is not easy.
from what I saw from a cpu gaming to a pro the difference of performanc, depends on the use; can be very, but also little. So both choices I think make sense. but I repeat I have no elements for a precise analysis.
fast model of advance steel. you see the use of cpu and gpu to use paratically to zero. the first gpu you see in the task manger is the integral that I do not use, so ignore it to do so.
at some point I start turning the model, which is not particularly large.Of course, it is not enough to fully exploit the hardware, but it is seen to rise both gpuche cpu to about 25/30%. so I use both.
Finally I launch a trivial render and here we see that the load is all towards the cpu. because autocad makes with that. does not have a modern engine that exploits the cores of the gpu that should be better.I have no chance to do in-depth checks, I know how hardware works on a few programs. Now on the pc I have only advance and I certainly do not contract licenses for my personal benefit, so well be sharing your experiences.balancing hardware components is always a source of doubt and is not easy.
from what I saw from a cpu gaming to a pro the difference of performanc, depends on the use; can be very, but also little. So both choices I think make sense. but I repeat I have no elements for a precise analysis.
Last edited:
BFausto
Guest
Hey, gil, I'm trying to answer you.
behavior with creo and 4070 is what you described (I attach image management activity of gpu in rotation phase of 3d).
as anticipated is reported to a mold of 585 (235 parts and assemblies and 350 from series taking into account that piece, hot chamber and cylinder are imported from step).
of this mold with a picture k4000 3gb (on the thousand of new euros) I had the need to keep disabled “mostra spigoli di siluetta” and low the antialias value (arrancava however).
with the new, all settings to the maximum and is very smooth.
Attachments
BFausto
Guest
I forgot...
the k4000 is of 2014, the 4070 is of this year.
the k4000 is of 2014, the 4070 is of this year.
cacciatorino
Guest
Is the slot compatible between the two cards?
BFausto
Guest
sincerely I did not try the new video card in the old pc (old pc intel i7 975 new amd ryzen 7 7800x3d).
df2001.98
Guest
for those who did not know him already, mark the benchmark for creo "ocus benchmark v7"
v7 ocus benchmark results link:
creosite.com
the benchmark can be downloaded from:
download ocus benchmark v7 – creosite
v7 ocus benchmark results link:
OCUS Benchmark v7 Result table – CreoSite
creosite.com
download ocus benchmark v7 – creosite
cacciatorino
Guest
In the meantime I read that the pciexpress protocol is retrocompatible, of course accepting the fact that a pcie 4.0 card will not be 100% exploited on a PCie 1.0 or 2.0 motherboard, for example.
gil
Guest
Che cpu Thai?