Congrats very vivid!... and now I enjoy success.. .
congratulations ... I fully share the choice of daimler .. how do you depend totaled from a softwarehouse?I answer a bit to everyone, now that the news is official. . .@ all: This is news and p o c a l e...
The waste will be tremendous... and maybe not the only one.
if you think that 10 years ago catia was practically the de facto standard in the automotive world, after 10 years:
... fiat took nx+tc
... nissan took nx+tc
... ford took tc
... daimler took nx+tc
... gm, after long benchmark against v6 remained on nx+tc
... mazda took nx+tc
... aml took nx+tc
... vw took tc
@ rs4: I am always + convinced that v6, with its "close" (obligating catia customers to take on with pdm enovia), was a clamorous mistake... a microsoft style attempt to impose a technology by levering on another.
Of course changing cad costs, but also putting on 2 pdm if you don't need any ribs, you know?
smarogd: it is the current "custom" pdm of daimler. is based on enterprise tc. will be gradually replaced by teamcenter
Home: it's mercedes... stop. (by little will also start analysis plm in mercedes truck... :biggrin
la "sorpresa" ds: the "full v6" solution has been evaluated. It was one of two on the table... discarded in the first round.
fantastic reading that ds does not yet know what will remain in use of applications in daimler... Nothing!
Italian contributions: my team has contributed to this incredible success... both directly on the "die" and indirectly, supporting fiat during the various reference visits made around the world by daimler.
... and now I enjoy success.. .
Thank you! ... waiting to do more damage, of course. ..:finger:Congrats very vivid!
You know...congratulations ... I fully share the choice of daimler .. how do you depend totaled from a softwarehouse?
in fact I believe in my small winning card was precisely to provide a software that did not close up like catia v6You know...
they chose a "partner" (siemens).
our systems are very integrated, but not "exclusively" integrated.
... if you want nx and as pdm you want sap or windchill you can do it
... if you want tc and how cad you want another (v5, creo :wink:, swx, if, inventor etc) you can do it
... with v6 is all very + difficult. . .
someone says it is because siemens is "tesca di cermania" and the nationalism of the crucchi is not discussed.in fact I believe in my small winning card was precisely to provide a software that did not close up like catia v6
Why?someone says it is because siemens is "tesca di cermania" and the nationalism of the crucchi is not discussed.
:biggrin:
means that mercedes will change cad gradously.Sorry, but that means:on september 20, 2010, daimler a. g. renewed its catia contract with dassault systèmes for five years.
Watch something...these were possible alternatives:teamcenter + catia v6: the first choice was to stay with their existing, heavily customized teamcenter installation and make catia v6 work with it. this would be possible but expensive, with the extra baggage of constant vendor culture clash under their roof.
ptc windchill: the second choice was to switch to ptc windchill for data management. it is a fine system with many happy customers. this would have been an expensive, drastic move, taking them out of the mainstream in automotive it. and again the vendor culture clash would be an issue.
massacre v6: the third choice would be to throw out their existing heavily customized version of teamcenter and standardize on the dassault v6 platform with catia and enovia. this would give them cutting edge technology, but they would pay a high price in both primary and secondary costs. the primary costs would be the software purchases; the secondary costs would be in installation, translation, maintenance, and training. the costs would be unreasonably expensive no matter how much pro-catia sentiment daimler’s engineers might have.
teamcenter + nx: the fourth choice would be to stay with the existing teamcenter installation and switch cad tools from catia to nx. this is the easiest and least expensive transition of the four possibilities.
matrix excuse, I forgot to put the link:finger:http://gfxspeak.com/2010/11/24/daimler-choice-of-nx-is-less-than-meets-the-eye/... to the face of the statement ds that "daimler hasn't rated v6"... instead the "full v6" solution was the first to be rejected.
Where did you get this information? :wink:
http://www.3ds.com/fr/company/news-.../3206/?chash=be1dd3336f645f8b45091e0bb4928c41matrix excuse, I forgot to put the link:finger:http://gfxspeak.com/2010/11/24/daimler-choice-of-nx-is-less-than-meets-the-eye/