maxopus
Guest
Hello, king, I know I'm a puzzlexxi and every now and then I enjoy inflaming the souls.here I would like to call on maintenance users: break the boxes to your dealer because there is no effective, fast and paramentary method to have simplified models in swx.
proe+aaax does this with a few clicks (I would pray maxopus not to enjoy too much with my statement) and I do not see why you should not strive to do something similar to the swx.
a joke I often make to my brother (a swx user) is: my cad is different ... but I do it to caxxeggiare and to relax for the entire days spent in front of the monitor.
I believe that the differences between pros and other cads, excluding the aax module and working in bottom-up mode, are due to different factors.
on the same machine, we loaded a set made with swx 2007 from 8300 components and a set of 9600 components made with pro/e wf3.
In both cases it was industrial machines, with simple geometries, a bit of sheet and commercial components such as bearings, supports, some chain and no surface.
the design in both cases was correct, there were no underdefinited couplings and the modeling was executed as a rule of art.
the first flashing difference is the fluidity that can boast pro/e in loading the big assemblies, in the realization of the explosions, and in the regeneration of the table, despite not having the light weight function of swx.
If I go to explode the main subgroups and drag a subaxieme composed of 5000 parts, in pro/e it is like moving a washer, in swx it makes a beast fatigue.
also to pull up the general axiemi boards, the loading times of pro/e are definitely lower.
I believe that this is due to the fact that pro/e was born in 88, when the machines were still in charcoal, and they have for start of things had to optimize the programming and performance of the system.
who arrived 10 years later had already discreet machines and often went to visual basic ... what obscene for a professional program.
pro/e is in c++, uses proprietary graphic bookcases and does not lean on windows (and we all know redmond what they do).
when you install it, it does not touch the system log and to delete it of the system just delete the folder that contains it.
If you want to move it to another hard-disk, just select the install folder, ctrl x and ctrl v ... and move it without having the slightest disguido, you just update the icons you have on your desktop and limit update the search.pro if you have the configuration folders locally.
if you move the project files from one folder to another and indicate it in search.pro ... he finds them and you do not need to indicate it for all the files you have moved.
is a different program concept, which someone defines not user-friendly, but that I find absolutely functional to the work of a designer.
then those of the ptc are caxxo heads like the others, because if the competition had not gone ... they would continue to sell the licenses at crazy prices and continue to do the superiors asking for + high figures for maintenance and exaggerated prices for some optional modules.
I noticed however that swx is improving notablemte of year in year, it is becoming + complete and 2010 is faster than 2007 there is nothing to say.
concluding swx is a nice program, they manage complex projects, and has no big problems.
pro/e is the program that I use and therefore my judgment on the same probably is not detached, because despite the defects (it has also him) is for me the best product existing on the market.