• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

... .

  • Thread starter Thread starter torok
  • Start date Start date
here I would like to call on maintenance users: break the boxes to your dealer because there is no effective, fast and paramentary method to have simplified models in swx.
proe+aaax does this with a few clicks (I would pray maxopus not to enjoy too much with my statement) and I do not see why you should not strive to do something similar to the swx.
Hello, king, I know I'm a puzzlexxi and every now and then I enjoy inflaming the souls.
a joke I often make to my brother (a swx user) is: my cad is different ... but I do it to caxxeggiare and to relax for the entire days spent in front of the monitor.
I believe that the differences between pros and other cads, excluding the aax module and working in bottom-up mode, are due to different factors.
on the same machine, we loaded a set made with swx 2007 from 8300 components and a set of 9600 components made with pro/e wf3.
In both cases it was industrial machines, with simple geometries, a bit of sheet and commercial components such as bearings, supports, some chain and no surface.
the design in both cases was correct, there were no underdefinited couplings and the modeling was executed as a rule of art.
the first flashing difference is the fluidity that can boast pro/e in loading the big assemblies, in the realization of the explosions, and in the regeneration of the table, despite not having the light weight function of swx.
If I go to explode the main subgroups and drag a subaxieme composed of 5000 parts, in pro/e it is like moving a washer, in swx it makes a beast fatigue.
also to pull up the general axiemi boards, the loading times of pro/e are definitely lower.

I believe that this is due to the fact that pro/e was born in 88, when the machines were still in charcoal, and they have for start of things had to optimize the programming and performance of the system.
who arrived 10 years later had already discreet machines and often went to visual basic ... what obscene for a professional program.

pro/e is in c++, uses proprietary graphic bookcases and does not lean on windows (and we all know redmond what they do).
when you install it, it does not touch the system log and to delete it of the system just delete the folder that contains it.
If you want to move it to another hard-disk, just select the install folder, ctrl x and ctrl v ... and move it without having the slightest disguido, you just update the icons you have on your desktop and limit update the search.pro if you have the configuration folders locally.

if you move the project files from one folder to another and indicate it in search.pro ... he finds them and you do not need to indicate it for all the files you have moved.

is a different program concept, which someone defines not user-friendly, but that I find absolutely functional to the work of a designer.
then those of the ptc are caxxo heads like the others, because if the competition had not gone ... they would continue to sell the licenses at crazy prices and continue to do the superiors asking for + high figures for maintenance and exaggerated prices for some optional modules.

I noticed however that swx is improving notablemte of year in year, it is becoming + complete and 2010 is faster than 2007 there is nothing to say.

concluding swx is a nice program, they manage complex projects, and has no big problems.
pro/e is the program that I use and therefore my judgment on the same probably is not detached, because despite the defects (it has also him) is for me the best product existing on the market.
 
Hello, king, I know I'm a puzzlexxi and every now and then I enjoy inflaming the souls.
He he, me too... and departs:biggrin::tongue:
a few months ago, for another time I started studying pro and, the more I learned, the less I liked it.
and very true that in regeneration of the big assemblies and very fast.
I collaborated with a study where I worked on same assemblies with boys who used proes, when I needed something, they were pulling in 2 seconds, (they still used wf 2 ) when they came to me, they had to book 10 min. first, so I load everything. and very stable and reliable pear, and a lot of balls and rumble, after a while, I discovered that even if I learned it perfectly, for me, it would be a great break of paxxe working in proe, so I remain absolutely countere
pro/e is in c++, uses proprietary graphic bookcases and does not lean on windows (and we all know redmond what they do).
I don't know who he uses, but I know that solidworks and a lot of bastard about graphics, and it's true that it's more colorful and cute, but he eats ram and graphics card like a beast.
when you install it, it does not touch the system log and to delete it of the system just delete the folder that contains it.
If you want to move it to another hard-disk, just select the install folder, ctrl x and ctrl v ... and move it without having the slightest disguido, you just update the icons you have on your desktop and limit update the search.pro if you have the configuration folders locally.

if you move the project files from one folder to another and indicate it in search.pro ... he finds them and you do not need to indicate it for all the files you have moved.
here I disagree, to carry proe I have seen doing a lot of things, the program, config, template, startup.... etc., however, swx can save all personalization in a file (cards, template addresses, icons, fast keys etc.)

A final comparison of mine is:
start (installation, configuration, entrepreneurship) swx 10- 0 pro and
simple modeling start, light assemblies swx 10 - 2 pro and
advanced modeling, free surfaces (creation) swx 9 - 5 pro and
advanced modeling, free surfaces (modifications) swx 6 - 8 pro and
large axiemi (management, file organization) swx 8 - 4 pro and
big assemblies (modifications updates, loading) swx 4 - 8 pro and
communication with other cad (swx better in import, proe better in export )
price, packages, available of modules etc. swx 9 - 3 pro and

then at the beginning swx and much higher from every point of view, the more you go towards the heavy, advanced, the more salt pro and and falls swx
I renounce it because simply reasoning of offspring is not compatible with my mentality and way of doing, and I exclude it from any subsequent evaluation (this because or much but very doubted, tried, informed etc.)

and true that lately I am disappointed by swx, but if I had to change cad, or add another, this will certainly not be proe


p.s. uhhh but how much I put to write what time is:
 
here I disagree, to carry proe I have seen doing a lot of things, the program, config, template, startup.... etc., however, swx can save all personalization in a file (cards, template addresses, icons, fast keys etc.)
Because they don't know how to use it, if you want me to make you a movie and see how it works.
A final comparison of mine is:
start (installation, configuration, entrepreneurship) swx 10- 0 pro and
simple modeling start, light assemblies swx 10 - 2 pro and
advanced modeling, free surfaces (creation) swx 9 - 5 pro and
advanced modeling, free surfaces (modifications) swx 6 - 8 pro and
large axiemi (management, file organization) swx 8 - 4 pro and
big assemblies (modifications updates, loading) swx 4 - 8 pro and
communication with other cad (swx better in import, proe better in export )
price, packages, available of modules etc. swx 9 - 3 pro and

then at the beginning swx and much higher from every point of view, the more you go towards the heavy, advanced, the more salt pro and and falls swx
I renounce it because simply reasoning of offspring is not compatible with my mentality and way of doing, and I exclude it from any subsequent evaluation (this because or much but very doubted, tried, informed etc.)

and true that lately I am disappointed by swx, but if I had to change cad, or add another, this will certainly not be proe


p.s. uhhh but how much I put to write what time is
but you are one of those who cut, cook and paste multi-corps... and puppets of this kind :biggrin::biggrin:
 
A final comparison of mine is:
start (installation, configuration, entrepreneurship) swx 10- 0 pro and
simple modeling start, light assemblies swx 10 - 2 pro and
advanced modeling, free surfaces (creation) swx 9 - 5 pro and
advanced modeling, free surfaces (modifications) swx 6 - 8 pro and
large axiemi (management, file organization) swx 8 - 4 pro and
big assemblies (modifications updates, loading) swx 4 - 8 pro and
communication with other cad (swx better in import, proe better in export )
price, packages, available of modules etc. swx 9 - 3 pro and
I just have a supply of popcorn, peanuts, beer etc. tonight I sit comfortable and watch the show... :tongue:

Hello and welcome back
 
no marco... no wars, after a couple of recent episodes I decided to retreat to the mountain in meditation. :-)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top