maxopus
Guest
I'm working on it... by Saturday I end up, not desperate and sorry for the unforgivable delay.
Exatem
Guest
opss... I just finished editing invective against you from another side...:biggrin:
maxopus
Guest
He's there, he's there, he's there.
enzo83
Guest
Hello, guys.
I am new to the site and I came to know of this discussion. if they are still in time I would like to join more than anything to make design experience. I am a new three-year degree in mechanical engineering. I graduated from bari technology.
Hi.
and
I am new to the site and I came to know of this discussion. if they are still in time I would like to join more than anything to make design experience. I am a new three-year degree in mechanical engineering. I graduated from bari technology.
Hi.
and
sampom
Guest
Welcome.
There is no problem, always in time and place there is at will (in fact, we are comfortable wide:biggrin
.read all the discussion (I know, it's long) you scan the data and evaluate what you're interested in and you could do.
greetings
Marco:smile:
enzo83
Guest
Okay, I'll try to read everything. But where did you get there?
Exatem
Guest
Hello, Enzo. welcome in cad3d and welcome on board.
The Laodice project was born a while ago. there have been substantial changes in work, rethinking, repetition. now it seems all still but actually under the ashes, the brace still burns. We are preparing something but we still need some time. as sampom told you, if you really want to participate, it is better that you choose a "subject" among the countless yet to develop and that you "push". to make you the point of the situation we say that after real peripecies we have established the forms of the building plan and we are "making the ferries" starting from the stern. we already have the propellers and are dimensionalizing the timones. for the rest is all free hunting ground. So much, of all the initial crew, we stayed just in a few.
Hello and we hope to resent you.
Exatem
Guest
Greetings to everyone.
I'm particularly addressing dragon. I'm gonna get you some work. :wink:
to have as maximum speed 16 knots, keeping hull, displacement, etc. original but adopting for diesel drive and gearboxes, how many kw do I need? and the propellers and axes what size they have?
Laodice is not dead, she took only a pause of reflection :finger:
Bye.
I'm particularly addressing dragon. I'm gonna get you some work. :wink:
to have as maximum speed 16 knots, keeping hull, displacement, etc. original but adopting for diesel drive and gearboxes, how many kw do I need? and the propellers and axes what size they have?
Laodice is not dead, she took only a pause of reflection :finger:
Bye.
maxopus
Guest
You won't believe it, but I finally put my hands on it and apologize for the huge delay.
the job is not finished yet, I miss the bow part.
Before you finish, I want you to try to thicken the enclosed surfaces and tell me if they can fit like this.
wind in the stern.... :smile:
the job is not finished yet, I miss the bow part.
Before you finish, I want you to try to thicken the enclosed surfaces and tell me if they can fit like this.
wind in the stern.... :smile:
sampom
Guest
..eccerto, because we have time to lose to recall the panorama:biggrin:
Give him gas!
back to traditional motorization you can dare more, right? considering also that the average holidays of us employing are a couple of weeks, with such a means I would like to push me a little over the 5 lands:wink:
greetings
Marco:smile:
sampom
Guest
It's unbelievable!
OK max, I'm going to check the attachment right now.
and do not go crazy for that bow (maledetta allei :biggrin
which seems to be in the construction site a new simplified configuration.greetings
Marco:smile:
maxopus
Guest
The bow isn't a problem. Just tell me if the job is fine.
What changes are there??? I'm the one who lost something or worked secretly?
What changes are there??? I'm the one who lost something or worked secretly?
sampom
Guest
no, nothing secret:biggrin:
only ideas that go and come from our volcanic exatem.
the bow was thought to make it without that bulb (which with appropriate carena lines can be not necessary), simplifying the modeling.
the surfaces seem to me ok for the phase in which we are (we are working the stern on very similar shapes); only you have not "closed" ending it "top" the high edge of the wall towards the bow:
But we haven't gotten to that area yet. and being "dead work" (out of water and "structural pole") has relative importance.@ exaYou always check that I don't say shit, huh?
soon we will post "the progress work".
greetings
Marco:smile:
maxopus
Guest
the high edge of the wall I left it deliberately so, I will fix it after the ok.
I look forward to the confirmations of exa and who else will want to express opinions to complete the work.
I have already shaped it without bulb, so you can add it later.
I prefer to keep the two things separate, so as to make any changes or suppressions easier.
Say hi.
sampom
Guest
in fact we are going on, to big "blocks"; stern, ship center and bow.
greetings to prox
Marco:smile:
sampom
Guest
qui c'è qualcosa:View attachment Allegati Laodice.rarthe whole is just "embassed" and with not proper modeling procedures.
the hatch is made and put there a little by chance.. but in the meantime to make the idea, to arouse curiositybiggrin and to stimulate suggestions, it can suffice.
from the kings, that the holidays are at the gates:
greetings
Marco:smile:
the hatch is made and put there a little by chance.. but in the meantime to make the idea, to arouse curiosity
biggrin and to stimulate suggestions, it can suffice. from the kings, that the holidays are at the gates:greetings
Marco:smile:
Exatem
Guest
hello max, welcome back on board.
I took a look at the surfaces and they really look like "liscies." only that the sections on the orders, no longer correspond to the originals. did you correct them to make surfaces regular? if so, they will remake the ferries made until now following the new "percours" correct.
look your info.
Bye.
already, but now marco you tried to check the ordered 0-9000 "supporting them" on the surfaces of max?, the first and last seem to be correctly inside the fasciame but the intermediates come out.
read the mail. :wink:
Hi.
maxopus
Guest
hi marco, to make a smooth surface and as simple as possible I must necessarily move from the ordered.
It is a matter of understanding whether the move is acceptable to you.
If I have to stay perfectly on the orders, the surfaces are really ugly and I spend very little time doing them.
to you the choice :smile:
A hug.
Exatem
Guest
That's great. I use your surfaces and correct the ferries made until now. the final aspect will certainly be better.
regarding the thickness to be given to the fasciame: will not be constant but decreases from the bottom to the top. to understand it could be 10, 9,8.7, 6mm. the same is done also for the stagne bulkheads in fact this is one of the reasons why I divide the ship into macro blocks in turn divided by horizontal planes to the intersections of the bridges.
in the week I pass the prora devoid of the bulb (always that you or sam, have not already done it). the bulb if you agree, we do it apart then we put it in and "we collect" everything.
now I greet you, I go to the sea:
Bye.
maxopus
Guest
hi marco, more than another good quality surface allows you:
- a remarkable lightness of the model (you will have noticed that with little more than 200 kbytes I pulled on almost half hull, if I had attacked the ordered saerbbe came out a model from dozens of megabytes);
- surface thicknesses without problems;
- correct transitions;
- Clean and fast fittings.
At this point I end up doing the bow and the wall, and when you pass the bulb we put it in so as to complete the work.
Say hi.