• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

v6 - direct modeling

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Matrix
  • Start date Start date

The_Matrix

Guest
someone who uses v6 (there will be someone after 2 and a half years..) knows how direct modeling works, compared to market leaders (synchronous technology nx and if, osd, spaceclaim).

Thank you.
 
cacciatorino said:
Intrigued by your question I had done a brief search on youtube and found something, but I guess you had already looked at it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaedmvr-pwehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjmpio7nvx0&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agtwdbls5ee&nr=1
Click to expand...
Hi hunting.. .
the first is not relevant: treats functional modeling.
The other two are too simple to draw any judgment, don't you think?
What did you think?
... i che nx/se/osd (ops, creo elements/direct)/sc sono dei vero direct modeller, mentre per catia v6 sia + un "orpello" e altri...

Another thing that leaves me "perplexed" is that I saw how some "projects" were faced with v6, apparently suitable for functional modeling... not used.
... I think there will be a why. .
 
The_Matrix said:
Hi hunting.. .
the first is not relevant: treats functional modeling.
The other two are too simple to draw any judgment, don't you think?
What did you think?
.
Click to expand...
for now no idea, even though I'm pretty well placed. I just step on if st3 begins to evaluate the synchronous environment, especially to realize if binding solids with pmi and liverules is more powerful or efficient than using sketches and features as in the traditional method.
 
cacciatorino said:
for now no idea, even though I'm pretty well placed. I just step on if st3 begins to evaluate the synchronous environment, especially to realize if binding solids with pmi and liverules is more powerful or efficient than using sketches and features as in the traditional method.
Click to expand...
If it wasn't that making movies after 2 minutes, I'd break my balls, create one to show you how I used the st in a recent fga presentation.
... what I would like is to compare the nx st implementation and if... unfortunately on itself internally. . You know...
 
The_Matrix said:
If it wasn't that making movies after 2 minutes, I'd break my balls, create one to show you how I used the st in a recent fga presentation.
... what I would like is to compare the nx st implementation and if... unfortunately on itself internally. . You know...
Click to expand...
If you're going through the vice side, you're going north and you're going to visit us so you show us nx and we show you sest3:biggrin:
 
axa said:
If you're going through the vice side, you're going north and you're going to visit us so you show us nx and we show you sest3:biggrin:
Click to expand...
I take it as a serious proposal. :cool:
I'll let you know.
 
wait till we get on the v6 project and then we'll give you all the info of the case. but we focus on migration cv5r18 ->cv5r20
 
v6 is not a simple cad to place, install and work!

It should be much more. so it takes time....
 
falonef said:
v6 is not a simple cad to place, install and work!

It should be much more. so it takes time....
Click to expand...
I know. I like and I "excite" (in a business sense, eh) the challenge of ds.
Good luck when you start... Do you have any ideas about timing?
 
I think not before 2.3 years! !
This time we no longer make the mistake of being the first to introduce it and then finance all the corrections:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 
falonef said:
I think not before 2.3 years! !
This time we no longer make the mistake of being the first to introduce it and then finance all the corrections:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
Click to expand...
Overcharity! !
... look that in December 2012 ends the world, so no v6! :finger:

Thanks the same...
 
The_Matrix said:
Overcharity! !
... look that in December 2012 ends the world, so no v6! :finger:

Thanks the same...
Click to expand...
you as you interpret this "use" of v6.
a jump into the vacuum of the ds, fear of the companies, change too drastic of mentality cad or...a red bull stops in the garage:biggrin:
 
stef_design said:
you as you interpret this "use" of v6.
a jump into the vacuum of the ds, fear of the companies, change too drastic of mentality cad or...a red bull stops in the garage:biggrin:
Click to expand...
I should be in ds to know. . .
from competitor of ds I can say:
1) putting a mandatory pdm is a huge bond for large and complex customers. . .
for example:
- vw/audi as pdm has teamcenter
- daimler as pdm has teamcenter (enterprise, but always him)
- airbus as pdm has windchill
... putting enovia compulsory is not a health pass... On the contrary

2) the fact of having the integrated pdm raises the "complexity"... small/medium customers who are usually the hard "zoccolo" passing version before, are afraid

3) are we sure that the market asks exactly a product like v6?

... remember that red bull is a loyal customer tc/nx... :) ... probably in a few days a big name will come out that will pull out the "red bull" from the garage.. .
 
from important sources I can tell you that some important German automobile companies have decided not to introduce v6 but bensi nx. next week will be official. It's a bean I give you in advance.
 
falonef said:
from important sources I can tell you that some important German automobile companies have decided not to introduce v6 but bensi nx. next week will be official. It's a bean I give you in advance.
Click to expand...
Is this news worrying... Will it be the end of the casket?
 
the largest German automobile companies will not pass to v6. they decided for nx for the history of the integrated database. The news will be official next week. I have it from safe sources!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top