motor advice

[linch]

ste8 if the prof asks you:
How do we replace worn parts without ruining the tree?
It would be a puzzle... but an answer should be given.

 

[ste8]

excuse my absolute ignorance, but I don't understand how these oil level indicators are made! I unload them and turn the macros on solids, but only the indicator carcass comes out, without glass, seal and another thing that appears in the section, but of which I do not understand the meaning.

Can anyone help me?
I've been pointing out the things that aren't clear to me (the red one should be the glass, right? and the yellow and green what are they? )
http://www.elesa.it/scheda_pdf_stampa_en_1_7405_1_5_1_25_76_763.aspx?t=-8589009475623835808

 

[ste8]

Yes, I do. or if they are particularly planted in place 2 forellini and two vines parker (until) to mo' d'extractor:biggrin:.
but if I have to make the joke so much it is worth doing it for any pressure, even if in this case there are not (it is not a rule, but I prefer so). Of course I have to remove lids for replacement.. but at that point it costs me little and control/pulisco everything better including internal or (although I do not have to replace the bearings, that there would be obligatory).
@ste8 it was said just above using the oil to "double lip":View attachment 20090..they are better in relation to the small price difference and they make you dust from the outside.

greetings
Marco:smile:

Marco excuse but I can't understand the difference between the double lip oil that you posted to me and what I put!
placed below the image also with the line of the inner part.
I hope these seals are properly mounted once and for all!
Thank you.

 

[meccanicamg]

excuse my absolute ignorance, but I don't understand how these oil level indicators are made! I unload them and turn the macros on solids, but only the indicator carcass comes out, without glass, seal and another thing that appears in the section, but of which I do not understand the meaning.

Can anyone help me?
I've been pointing out the things that aren't clear to me (the red one should be the glass, right? and the yellow and green what are they? )
http://www.elesa.it/scheda_pdf_stampa_en_1_7405_1_5_1_25_76_763.aspx?t=-8589009475623835808

It is normal that you are not given the detail design of production. If you want to put the seal or not, nothing changes. If you see that there's a few parts missing like glass, you do it and put it in place.

substantially is a blank cap with transparent glass in front, an inner chamber with a plastic star that filters the oil from its big holes.

The green one is the glass. look at the photo...it is not difficult

 

[ste8]

It is normal that you are not given the detail design of production. If you want to put the seal or not, nothing changes. If you see that there's a few parts missing like glass, you do it and put it in place.

substantially is a blank cap with transparent glass in front, an inner chamber with a plastic star that filters the oil from its big holes.

The green one is the glass. look at the photo...it is not difficult

Okay.
Maybe I get it!
and where should I mount it? I thought maybe on one of the two side faces, but at what height? I need to check the oil, so definitely beyond the maximum bearing height, don't I?

 

[ste8]

ste8 if the prof asks you:
How do we replace worn parts without ruining the tree?
It would be a puzzle... but an answer should be given.

I think the best answer would be to say that it would take some bushings and replace those.
Moreover, the project provides that the components have a life greater than 15000 hours and for the bearings is ensured. other components are not subject to this course!

 

[linch]

I think the best answer would be to say that it would take some bushings and replace those.
Moreover, the project provides that the components have a life greater than 15000 hours and for the bearings is ensured. other components are not subject to this course!

No, that's not the answer, but I don't want to confuse your ideas because the subject is out of line.
Hi.

 

[sampom]

Marco excuse but I can't understand the difference between the double lip oil that you posted to me and what I put

Yes, forgive me, you're right. first with small pictures I didn't see the second "labbrino" duster. It's the same. Okay:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[cacciatorino]

Okay.
Maybe I get it!
and where should I mount it? I thought maybe on one of the two side faces, but at what height? I need to check the oil, so definitely beyond the maximum bearing height, don't I?

Actually, no, the oil should be bitten by the lower gear and then fired by centrifugation around, but the routes would be a little bit studied.

It is not good that bearings and gears are submerged by oil, because by doing so the oil could emulsify itself (become a foam of air and oil) thus drastically losing the lubricating properties.

do a search using "unbeatable lighting" as a keyword.

 

[ste8]

Actually, no, the oil should be bitten by the lower gear and then fired by centrifugation around, but the routes would be a little bit studied.

It is not good that bearings and gears are submerged by oil, because by doing so the oil could emulsify itself (become a foam of air and oil) thus drastically losing the lubricating properties.

do a search using "unbeatable lighting" as a keyword.

thanks hunter,
I'll do research for personal interest, but I think it's a little too much about the project!

 

[meccanicamg]

Okay.
Maybe I get it!
and where should I mount it? I thought maybe on one of the two side faces, but at what height? I need to check the oil, so definitely beyond the maximum bearing height, don't I?

you have to put on the side where you have space at a height slightly lower than the shaft lids 2 (the lower one) so as to keep in the oil bath the lower gear up to the height of the shaft but without completely soaking the bearing.

 

[ste8]

you have to put on the side where you have space at a height slightly lower than the shaft lids 2 (the lower one) so as to keep in the oil bath the lower gear up to the height of the shaft but without completely soaking the bearing.

Is that okay?

 

[sampom]

Is that okay?

Wait! ! !
but the "flanging" of junction of the 2 semicarter did not make it continue all around on the 2 long vertical sides??? Would you like to keep it closed just above and below?

.. placed an image with at least 2 views.

greetings
Mar

p.s. and do not continue to say that "would be too much" for your project. whatever projects must have a sense and a feasibility; small or big that you must have clear what you are doing and why.

 

[meccanicamg]

Is that okay?

you should post the photo/viste of all the reducer and above all make us understand which side is high and low. the "beautiful oil" you put must stand on one side and of course for how the reducer is mounted must be verified that the oil well is at the bottom.

quoto same question as sampom... you never showed us the side view of the reducer but it seems from that shortcut that you only put 4 screws to hold the two tits together and above all there are no screws on the other two sides (lateral of the reducer).

the level of oil is about that which I tell you if the reducer you will mount it like this:

 

[MBT]

Is that okay?

put at least 6 screws on the flange
and on the same diameter at least 2 extraction screws, with the same thread as the fixing screws:finger:

 

[cacciatorino]

.. placed an image with at least 2 views.

or even a nice pdf3d, if swx students do it.

 

[ste8]

Wait! ! !
but the "flanging" of junction of the 2 semicarter did not make it continue all around on the 2 long vertical sides??? Would you like to keep it closed just above and below?

.. placed an image with at least 2 views.

greetings
Mar

p.s. and do not continue to say that "would be too much" for your project. whatever projects must have a sense and a feasibility; small or big that you must have clear what you are doing and why.

I guess your first question predicts a response like this: No, you see, the flanging is all around the two semicarter, not just above and below! I'll make it sober!

in little place the pictures with various views.

my "would be too much" refers to the fact that this project has a lot of passion for me, but I do not want it to take away too much time to study other exams, considering the fact that this exam is written and the design will look at it only at the oral, I do not know whether in a thorough or not!

Thank you very much!
Hi.
I'm sorry.

 

[ste8]

the level of oil is about that which I tell you if the reducer you will mount it like this:

Okay, I'll soon post pictures of the various views, but allow me a question:
how are the two high bearings lubricated?

 

[meccanicamg]

Okay, I'll soon post pictures of the various views, but allow me a question:
how are the two high bearings lubricated?

they are lubricated because turning the lower dense wheels will produce abundant splashes of oil that will allow the lubrication of the upper organs (in fact I was afraid that I had put the light on the tree above).

 

[KLA#27]

I didn't read all the posts... only the first 2 pages and part of the last.

the vertical division thus is very particular but feasible, it is necessary to foresee a proper spindle of the case for assembly,

I would put in specially designed lubrication plant with sprayers contact points, about 3 knm to 1200 rpm are a high power, which generates a lot of heat, hardly dissipable with lubrication to beat if the operation is h24.

attention to the limit laps of the bearings!! by experience I always had difficulty!!! Also because I usually use 300 mm up and 1200rpm bearings heat a lot, therefore forced lubrication of bearings.

Is the intersection like input?? for a report 1 : 1.33 seems excessive (by evaluating the proportions of the images posted...) I have not seen quotas...

In the end, I tell you that everything you read here is true, but every reducer has a story to itself...