problem

[luca984]

1 - since many times I have to use I am command alternating it to the assignment command when I go to make a filling you create a draft that stona how do I delete is drafting? ?

2- and better use the replenishment command (e.g. to combine a surface extrapolated in curvature and a tangency or join a radius to a flat surface) or connection? ? ?

3- multisection command then what's the point? ?

Thank you

 

[panormus]

Let's see if I understand...
As for the draft...
the problem probably occurs because one of the curves on which the filling surface rests is not created correctly and tends to degenerate the surface, it may also be necessary to further divide the area to be filled in more properly created pieces.

Can you post some pictures?

with the connections you create the basic surfaces that give shape to the object, with the filling close spaces remained isolated ra reference surfaces.

if you are looking among my posts you will find golden tips provided by ferrezio and barlafus.

bye

 

[luca984]

you are placed the superfic image in black circle hello

 

[panormus]

However look that the pierarg board is very valid and gave you the best advice that you can give to a self-taught that you want to learn to work that the surfaces, there are many concepts that you understand following those tutorials, do not take them under your leg.

 

[panormus]

However look that the pierarg board is very valid and gave you the best advice that you can give to a self-taught that you want to learn to work that the surfaces, there are many concepts that you understand following those tutorials, do not take them under your leg.

I share myself.. with 5 hours of sleep I was melted.. .
Look at this. .http://www.dicksonsham.com/front.html

 

[luca984]

thanks panormus pierag?? ? ?

I'll look at them anyway. . .

ps: does not make me load the imaggins

 

[luca984]

Let's try
View attachment luca.rar

 

[panormus]

Let's try
View attachment 29321

how did you create that pile of pieces of surfaces?
I think you should do it again, but I don't have a vision together to understand what it is. Listen to me, put aside this job and follow the exercises of the site I posted to you, you will learn how to use the surfaces:finger:

 

[luca984]

how did you create that pile of pieces of surfaces?
I think you should do it again, but I don't have a vision together to understand what it is. Listen to me, put aside this job and follow the exercises of the site I posted to you, you will learn how to use the surfaces:finger:

the figure and cut in reality and a lens that part was an ofset of mun other surface, the problem and that when you make loffset the shit (the offset) not always makes you do it (''' error of topolygia ...''') so you create only a piece of surface so the rest you praise '' inventing you.

 

[ferrezio]

even if you do not get a good offset of a complete surface, you can always exclude the surfaces that degenerate.
Surely all the cusps degenerate the closing fuper, you must define the closing curves of the fitting as in the figure or reconstruct the edge with the extension of the surfaces and recreate the fitting.

Hi.

 

[luca984]

anxhe if you do not get a good offset of a complete surface, you can always exclude the surfaces that degenerate.
Surely all the cusps degenerate the closing fuper, you must define the closing curves of the fitting as in the figure or reconstruct the edge with the extension of the surfaces and recreate the fitting.

Hi.

practically I have to project the edges of the sup a.b.c.d and create more surfaces instead of a single so as to have a better tangency? ? ♪

ps: fillet things? ?

g 2 = warp propagation. but concerning the extrapolar command or sweep or what??? ♪

 

[ferrezio]

ps: girl loses??

Agreement

the more you could simply exclude all that surfaces and build a new one that resurfaces the model better.

Hi.

 

[Mocca]

I agree fervently.
extend in "continuity" horizontal and vertical surfaces after which you run the new connection by analyzing what is currently there.
I see you work in the "wireframe and surface design" environment. if you can work in the environment "generative shape design" which is similar to the previous but with some extra function (including chord).
I also noticed that you work in "parametric" mode and make molds. I think you should work in non-parametric mode and even "without keeping the surfaces" in such a way as to shorten the mile tree you have; for your work you don't need to have everything parametric (I think).
we waved

 

[luca984]

then I answer both

@ mocca :
about my work, yes, plastic molding, for quanyo it's about the parametric function you're right so it's better the ''without preserving the surfaces' from where I imposed it?. What do you mean to extend in continuity? ?

@ ferrezio : and what I did with the filling giving references for the curves in tangenza but came maluccio ... and cmq all those surfaces must have an offset of a tot of mm , is the offset of an initial surface

♪

 

[panormus]

- Yeah. well returned

 

[Mocca]

Hello, boy.
but did you end up bombing the question forum on catia? You don't want to be #1 in the world. :biggrin:

by luca:
What version of catia you use? Maybe a part of that area. I'll fix it by letting you stand the parameters so that you can see the command I used.
for in "conserve surfaces" active or disactive with the icon (yellow surface) to the right of that of the parameter.
we waved

 

[panormus]

I am really almost embarrassed because in other forums I frequent, while writing often my nick does not stand up, while here is actually a little embarrassing. . a few days the moderator will pass me in black list

but I promise that if he became good enough and I find a job as a designer, I repeat the posts for a month :-d

 

[luca984]

Hello, boy.
but did you end up bombing the question forum on catia? You don't want to be #1 in the world. :biggrin:

by luca:
What version of catia you use? Maybe a part of that area. I'll fix it by letting you stand the parameters so that you can see the command I used.
for in "conserve surfaces" active or disactive with the icon (yellow surface) to the right of that of the parameter.
we waved

hio mocca then use catia p3 vsr19

I put the link here ciau:finger:
View attachment luca6.rar

 

[Mocca]

hio mocca then use catia p3 vsr19

I put the link here ciau:finger:
View attachment 29404

you must attach not the image but a part of the area in question; or in original format catia or even in iges.

 

[luca984]

I feel so View attachment luca17.rarciau :finger: