• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

but where is it? (some management problems)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brethil
  • Start date Start date

Brethil

Guest
hello to everyone, I'm sorry for the french but I'm really desperate!!! If there's some pious soul that can enlighten me,
thanks in advance to all

for work I deal with cooling towers, ie cubes of

plate filled with c needles, sheet metal panels etc...



use inventor 2011 for about 6 months and are self-taught; I am single user and therefore do not use the vault, my projects are in local folders,
I do not use ipart, because they are not sufficiently prepared and
I create every part from me, copying it in the various folders
project whenever you need the use of the same part
for more orders.

said that, when I am working on the file together for
realize the above cubes... I find myself in the stakes when I have to:
copy, mirror, serialize components, lower
level....inventor kneading me; instead if I don't give anything to these
things and place every time the parts and win one by one goes
everything smooth...because I can not use peacefully sti instruments
that would long halve the time of escution? ? ? ?

I'm probably missing something background, which I might know if
In the company they made me take a course... but here..nisba...sigh!!

It's not over...
a complete tower has something like 2500 bolts, as many dice and
double the washers... once you place the parts
(opportunely copied from the center contained in my personal project folder...x es "bulloneria m8")...if for example I dare serialize x type 15 holes, a screw, a bolt and two washers already bound to the first hole...the cursed is kneaded!!!...and yes I have 6giga ram and a nvidia picture fx1800; of course I do not create shuttles or only physical simulations.

the drivers of the video card are certified, inventor 2011 has the license, the pig goes from god except inventor...insomma..I no longer know how to behave. . .

I repeat, I could also ignore basic things, only from "self-daughter" :wink:...I don't know how to distract me, to make files *.iam maybe less heavy and difficult to manage. . .

Even to lower the level of some components to create sub-axis in order to lighten a final set, it is practically impossible. ..uffa!!! :mad:

any advice to give to a poor self-taught??? ? :confused:

thanks to all in any case
 
As a profane, the first thing I'd be sure of is if the windows~inventor chain is all 32-bit, or all 64-bit, even because those 6 gbrams only exploit them with win64...

:
 
question of caxxo: You have 6 gb rams, but on what operating system do you spin it I'm inventor?
 
Hello excuse everyone, my little precision. . .
Therefore the software is the entire suite autocad inventor 2011, the s.o. is winxp professional x64 and the installation of inventor is the one for the s.o. 64bit (executed correctly); while the machine is:

hewlett-packard
hpz400 workstation
intel(r) xeon(r) cpu
w3520 @2.67ghz
with 5.98gb ram

I hope you can really be useful to me, otherwise thanks anyway to all

 
hello excuse everyone, my little precision. . .
therefore the software is the entire suite autocad inventor 2011, the s.o. is winxp professional x64 and the installation of inventor is the one for the s.o. 64bit (executed correctly); while the machine is:

hewlett-packard
hpz400 workstation
intel(r) xeon(r) cpu
w3520 @2.67ghz
with 5.98gb ram

i hope you can really be useful to me, otherwise thanks anyway to all
the only one in the world to have a xp x64:biggrin:
is the car a little old or isn't it? how old is she?
 
mmmh. They took it new for me when I started working here about 7-8 months ago, I highly hope that my problems do not depend on this... or am I wrong? :confused:

home I had a PC with a view of 32bit to 2gb ram and a nvidia 8600m gs from 256mb ram and the cursed inventor (at the time 2009) turned me better than with the 6 giga ram and a nvidia picture fx1800 that I have at work??? ? ?

I'm not going to be such a loser?

:frown:
 
mmmh. They took it new for me when I started working here about 7-8 months ago, I highly hope that my problems do not depend on this... or am I wrong? :confused:
can not have taken it "new" 7-8 months ago and mount a xeon to 3 ghz and xp! host!
 
You probably don't have all the wrongs... but what I have to work and this...sigh!! !

But do you think my problems above depend on a pile of pigs?
 
uffa...that is, I wonder... but is it possible that all the above listed commands send me to sclero inventor 2011?
and again, and true that if I make more assemblies of parts and then put them in my final set, instead of binding everything in a single set, the final .iam file weighs less and manages better? ? ?
At least I try to go this way. . .

cmq thanks for the availability tristan:redface:
 
the only one in the world to have a xp x64:biggrin:
Is the car a little old or isn't it? How old is she?
I also have it, (and I believe I am still in many); My car is less than three years old and goes to god....
I think brethil's problem is somewhere else.
Look, it's trivial, but it doesn't hurt, so you clean up the log... .
 
I also have a z400, with win 7 pro 64 bits, and initially I was not happy.
but now things have improved (a bit I resigned).
among the things that the assistance set me to make it work well inv 2011 there are:
- elimination of all frills from win7
- 12 gb ram
- settling of inv graphic settings on "compatibility"
- with the database (despite the servers being old) inventor is much faster and more stable than when I saved files on my pc's hd.

p.s.
As a profane, I find that the "projects" do not work well.
I don't know vault, my base date is made by "third parties."
ache I tend to be a self-taught, but I strongly recommend you take a good course.
 
mmmmmmh...bella tarkus, but I don't know where to place the hands in the register to help my inventor 2011... do you have any advice to give me in case?
:smile:

cmq from what I understand according to you 6gb d ram are a little too few for inventor on a car like this, right?

Yet inventor turns very fast in sketching, working and design environment; It's only when I need to copy, serialize, lower level that the "dog" is engaged. .

I was thinking that maybe in the end I will fix trying to derive parts from more under assemblies and then assemble them in a final .iam in order to lighten the workload... Always trying to be a good idea or not?

Take advice. .
What do you think is the best way to emblude (about 4000 and passes pieces between screws, bolts and washers) without going crazy with the series for hours and hours?
that I know, make a set of screws, ronds and bolts already prepared and then bind it to the final axieme or attempt the way of bolted connections?
I mean, what's the least way worse for you?

thanks again all for patience:biggrin:
 
you don't have to put your hands in the register, you have to download, it's free, ccleaner or another similar program for cleaning the registry, then you launch the registry cleaning and delete everything that found you.
However, I have 4gb, with a graphics card 1700 and turns discreetly up to 5,000 occasions. ...so with 6gb, you should go better, but I would try not to serialize the bolt, to insert only a representative sample, and to manually adjust the quantities in the bom...
 
Okay I'm downloading cccleaner and I'll try it. .

regarding the serialization of the bolts what you mean by

"Insert only a representative sample, and adjust by hand the quantities in the bom..."

Sorry my deep and lacunous ignorance..:smile:
 
Okay I'm downloading cccleaner and I'll try it. .

regarding the serialization of the bolts what you mean by

"Insert only a representative sample, and adjust by hand the quantities in the bom..."

Sorry my deep and lacunous ignorance..:smile:
I mean, what do you need to put all the screws in? Do you have to do a solicitation test?
Or you just need to put them in to see them, and why do you have the amount in the list? (bom)
In the second case, you can only put those that are needed for a typical packaging (what you would serialize) and insert by hand
the total quantity in the bom..
It's not the best, but your set is definitely lighter. . .
 
Nono, no analysis or what. .
I have to insert them into the final axieme and then in the future render everything, only that bolts must necessarily be visible in the axieme now put 2 images

Basically I need to place the bolts or set of 1 bolt plus washers and dice (as in photo) in the .iam final file...only that with my pigeon it struggles and serialize for each hole...and maybe you are proposing a solution but I'm struggling to understand that I have to...

Don't hate me:
 

Attachments

  • assieme bullone.webp
    assieme bullone.webp
    158.9 KB · Views: 34
  • bulloni.webp
    bulloni.webp
    150.8 KB · Views: 26

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top