fuse

[panormus]

Bye to all,

I would like to first realize the surface of a piper cub, then dissecting the fuse with plans along the position of the ordered draw the latter.

if I design the front view sketch/profile, side view sketch/profile and view sketch/profile from above can I develop the fuselage for intersection of 3 data?

If you like? with the sweep? should I set profile, guide and back?

panormus

 

[marcofa]

look at this link
http://files.fliiby.com/download.ph...yd2pn7.pdf&token=jta5tcuyn2rtjtywweylmjqlrui=

marco

 

[panormus]

look at this link
http://files.fliiby.com/download.ph...yd2pn7.pdf&token=jta5tcuyn2rtjtywweylmjqlrui=

marco

mmhhh... It seems more complicated than what it should and could be.
Tell me how this solution seems to you:
sketch tracer -> amount the 3 views of the aircraft -> environment free style -> recalc the profiles with lines 3d -> development the surfaces (I have to see. They're the first weapons with the sw.

Thank you.:smile:

 

[falonef]

Yes, but you need the license. in the presentation methodology you do not need the sketch tracer license

 

[panormus]

Hey, guys.

Can you tell me how I can limit solids?
I should limit the intersection of the pipes of the beam (see attachment) and the intersection of steel pipes with the wooden orders.

greetings

ps the job advances... and also thanks to you:finger:

 

[Tequila]

Hey, guys.

Can you tell me how I can limit solids?
I should limit the intersection of the pipes of the beam (see attachment) and the intersection of steel pipes with the wooden orders.

greetings

ps the job advances... and also thanks to you:finger:

Nice work, congratulations. . .

 

[RS4]

Hey, guys.

Can you tell me how I can limit solids?
I should limit the intersection of the pipes of the beam (see attachment) and the intersection of steel pipes with the wooden orders.

greetings

ps the job advances... and also thanks to you:finger:

good interesting :biggrin: frame traliccio simil ducati

What are you going to do now? What is the next step?? ?

Hi.

♪

 

[panormus]

good interesting :biggrin: frame traliccio simil ducati

What are you going to do now? What is the next step?? ?

Hi.

♪

thanks for the compliments, you are generous, but the next step was to limit the solids
You know how I can do that?

at the moment I am making the other orders that will be placed appropriately. I'm going to lay down the fuselage, but I'll need you.

greetings and thanks again

 

[panormus]

I have to believe that no one knows how to limit solids? Suu... .

 

[Tequila]

I have to believe that no one knows how to limit solids? Suu... .

I do not use and do not know how to use catia, so wait for some catia user to read the discussion and suggest how to do.. .
Hi.

 

[RS4]

thanks for the compliments, you are generous, but the next step was to limit the solids
You know how I can do that?

at the moment I am making the other orders that will be placed appropriately. I'm going to lay down the fuselage, but I'll need you.

greetings and thanks again

Maybe explain yourself better with examples of images so we don't understand? ? ?

Hi.

♪

 

[panormus]

Maybe explain yourself better with examples of images so we don't understand? ? ?

Hi.

♪

Are you not a designer? :biggrin:
Don't offend, I'm joking, of course, but if you know what it means to limit surfaces you should understand that I mean by "relimiting solids", I have to limit the node generated by the intersection of pipes.

 

[ferrezio]

Are you not a designer? :biggrin:
Don't offend, I'm joking, of course, but if you know what it means to limit surfaces you should understand that I mean by "relimiting solids", I have to limit the node generated by the intersection of pipes.

I'm afraid you made a mistake. if you models a series of tubes in one part (at least what I feel to understand from the pictures, the series of tubes are considered as a unique body for which it makes no sense to cut the elements.
you had to make a product where each tube was a part and then cut into the single part with the "cut".

Hi.

 

[RS4]

Are you not a designer? :biggrin:
Don't offend, I'm joking, of course, but if you know what it means to limit surfaces you should understand that I mean by "relimiting solids", I have to limit the node generated by the intersection of pipes.

bye panormus

it was just what I wanted to understand that if you modeled in one part it doesn't make sense to limit it was just to extrude to the surface or to the next element

I'm afraid you made a mistake. if you models a series of tubes in one part (at least what I feel to understand from the pictures, the series of tubes are considered as a unique body for which it makes no sense to cut the elements.
you had to make a product where each tube was a part and then cut into the single part with the "cut".

Hi.

hi Ferrantio was my own doubt

:finger: you had to do as the friend of hardware says


Hi.

Thank you.

♪

 

[panormus]

bye panormus

it was just what I wanted to understand that if you modeled in one part it doesn't make sense to limit it was just to extrude to the surface or to the next element



hi Ferrantio was my own doubt

:finger: you had to do as the friend of hardware says


Hi.

Thank you.

♪

Thank you both, you were precious. to the next post;-)

 

[panormus]

Hello, girl.
other question: how do I make sure that the reference system of each part coincides with the reference/terna of axes of the total product?

I'll get you an image to understand.

greetings

 

[PierArg]

Good question!! !
If you just want to do the things "do good"... and by all means I mean how to work at boeing, airbus, etc. when you realize every single component you never have to do it in the origin of the axes but you already have to take into account where it would be in the axieme.

In this way, when you assemble the various parts, they have all the matching tarts.


Please someone correct me if I said a cag@t@.

Thank you.

 

[peloritano]

Good question!! !
If you just want to do the things "do good"... and by all means I mean how to work at boeing, airbus, etc. when you realize every single component you never have to do it in the origin of the axes but you already have to take into account where it would be in the axieme.

In this way, when you assemble the various parts, they have all the matching tarts.


Please someone correct me if I said a cag@t@.

Thank you.

the same thing is done in the automotive mold industry. . . .
to always have the same origin you can draw the various parts directly in the product, i.e. you start from a product and by right clicking on the tree choose component and then new part... will ask you if for the new part you want to create a new axle system or use that of the prooduct... choose "no" and you will have the axle system of the product

 

[panormus]

the same thing is done in the automotive mold industry. . . .
to always have the same origin you can draw the various parts directly in the product, i.e. you start from a product and by right clicking on the tree choose component and then new part... will ask you if for the new part you want to create a new axle system or use that of the prooduct... choose "no" and you will have the axle system of the product

thanks for the answers boys, I noticed that in the phase of insertion part asks me if to make the reference coincide, then for the future no problem, but having created more part with system axes different from that of the main product how can I correct (if I can)?

Attached a question for you.
Thank you.
♪

 

[peloritano]

all your parts will be created in the absolute axle system....anywhere you will have to build a new axle system that will actually be the position of your part in the overall... then move the part into the new axle system using the command moves from axis to axis.... .
Maybe I wasn't quite clear, but being through messages is really difficult. .