• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

...if impossible to develop? ? ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reggio
  • Start date Start date

reggio

Guest
... hello to everyone, I repeated this section with various measures, on new files but every time development gives me error.. .

...and even is such a simple section ... :confused: :frown:
 

Attachments

  • sezione impossibile.webp
    sezione impossibile.webp
    70.1 KB · Views: 61
... hello to everyone, I repeated this section with various measures, on new files but every time development gives me error.. .

...and even is such a simple section ... :confused: :frown:
reggio has happened many times to me especially when you do the flange on the intermediate plane. . .
try to turn off the fold, flatten and return to fold. after which it reactivates the fold. It usually works!
 
reggio has happened many times to me especially when you do the flange on the intermediate plane. . .
try to turn off the fold, flatten and return to fold. after which it reactivates the fold. It usually works!
hello and thanks, to me rarely the "truck" works, even in this case no... :frown:
 
Shit! ... this is beautiful. .
or I am tonto myself or this time (:biggrin:) is right reggio.

I press that for various reasons we have not yet passed to 2011 so I never noticed;
done with 2010 no problem, from sketch I draw the profile that I want with all the folds that I like and there are no problems.

tried with 2011 and jumps out that error :eek:. with any form, intermediate plane or not, the result is always the same. or better, even with the error signaling in the tree the development does it, but lacks a fold.
it seems that from open sketch you do not accept profiles with more than 3 folds, from the fourth you have to add them with the flange of the edge.. and if it's really so I'd say it's a nice caxxata! !
I don't think it's my running mistakes, since 2007 I've always shaped like that without problems.
if the "programmers" decided to change the consolidated and comfortable rules of execution (and why never then?) the error made them (another... :biggrin:).

true, suspending and reactivating that incriminated fold after a few attempts, it seems to get settled.. but still remains a ridiculous and unjustifiable caxxata. who assures me that in subsequent regeneration/savings and closures/openings of files the problem is not resumed? It's a go back instead of progress, we're not talking about new features or implementations. If I miss the old commands work more as you have to be fine.

I think I'll keep waiting, we'll talk about it with 2012.

greetings
Marco:smile:
 
I may not understand the problem, but sections like those are at the order of the
day and I have never experienced any problems, considering that my work
is based on 90% of sheets, I would have already found it.
allego files for vs verify.
swx 2011 sp 3
 

Attachments

  • canale.zip
    canale.zip
    85.1 KB · Views: 6
  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    132.5 KB · Views: 34
I may not understand the problem, but sections like those are at the order of the
day and I have never experienced any problems, considering that my work
is based on 90% of sheets, I would have already found it.
allego files for vs verify.
swx 2011 sp 3
I found it strange that you had never reported it.

Look at your file and I'll tell you.

greetings
Mar
 
I found it strange that you had never reported it.

Look at your file and I'll tell you.

greetings
Mar
I quote you for sympathy.... :smile:

@reggio, can you post the file I try to open it with my pc?
Thank you...:finger:

ps: I find that the 2011 version is very stable and performing, Monday I will update
the various clients at sp 4, I have already created the administrative image Saturday.
a bug I had found in the sheets was fixed in sp 3 ( error in factor k, while changing it did not update all folds with the function "sheet converts").
I had discussed it in another post and also soliduser had found the bug.
For the rest.... never more trouble... apart from multibody sheets I only create in cases
"disperated" and cases where the number of components is easily manageable.
Everything's okay.
 
Look at your file and I'll tell you.
... then. .
Yes, the "problematic" is that, the profile and way to run it as well.
just opened your file is fine, everything regular. but if I enter into a sketch and define it or change a relationship, on the return part jumps out the notice and misses a fold.
after a "random" series updated list of items and reconstructions return to place, but if I try again to change something it turns again daccapo.

if I model a new part starting from your sketch (copy and paste) the error gives it to me immediately and I solve only suspending and reactivating that missing fold. . It remains the fact that with subsequent modifications to the sketch you will hang again and I have to remake all the correction procedure.

Okay, I'm at sp 0.0, but it's not a justification since it's an old feature that always worked very well. to you does not mai Do you?
What's wrong with you?

that done by me before the corrections:View attachment canale smpm.rar how do you open it/see?

and related pictures:CANALE smpm.webpCANALE smpm 01.webpHello
marco
 
..I would only like to say, for the "flying ghosts" (:biggrin:), that these are not criticism "for the sake of..".
We use the program, we know, we work. we like and in a way maybe we also got attached.. and it is precisely for this (and for more reason) that the incaxations increase for these "defectious dupids".

all cads (and softwares in general) will be so... in fact all users cyclically become incaxxan:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:
 
..I would only like to say, for the "flying ghosts" (:biggrin:), that these are not criticism "for the sake of..".
We use the program, we know, we work. we like and in a way maybe we also got attached.. and it is precisely for this (and for more reason) that the incaxations increase for these "defectious dupids".

all cads (and softwares in general) will be so... in fact all users cyclically become incaxxan:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:
Hello, Marco, what are you doing? Throw water before you see fire? :biggrin: how do you do in summer when there is drought?
 
I don't have a problem like mike.
It's a very strange mistake, the records might be blown.
if reggio attached the file, it would be much easier to understand.
Try to upgrade to the SP4, maybe they'll fix some things.
 

Attachments

  • Cattura.webp
    Cattura.webp
    32.6 KB · Views: 11
I don't have a problem like mike.
It's a very strange mistake, the records might be blown.
if reggio attached the file, it would be much easier to understand.
Try to upgrade to the SP4, maybe they'll fix some things.
I attached it.

it is done with sp0, but I repeat that it is not a justification for an old feature that has always been working.
update ok.. but it seems normal and correct to work with a "zoppo" program waiting at least six months for corrections (always that you are in subscriptions)?
and applies to all bugs, small and large, of all softwares "pro".. We're not talking about video games, people are eating us with stuff.

greetings
Marco:smile:

p.s. then it's enough, I'm silent and I keep throwing water:biggrin:
 
I attached it.

it is done with sp0, but I repeat that it is not a justification for an old feature that has always been working.
update ok.. but it seems normal and correct to work with a "zoppo" program waiting at least six months for corrections (always that you are in subscriptions)?
and applies to all bugs, small and large, of all softwares "pro".. We're not talking about video games, people are eating us with stuff.

greetings
Marco:smile:

p.s. then it's enough, I'm silent and I keep throwing water:biggrin:
It's a very strange mistake.
hundreds of thousands of users use it every day.
I don't believe in the bug.
if it is not repeatable, it means that it is bound to something not inherent to sw.
understand what it is, this is the real problem.
Try reassigning the logs.
Perhaps an accidental sw closure corrupted its structure.
I always recommend after installation and customization of toolbars, save settings through your tool.
 
...cut and add flange.. .ps: "edit" of the forum does not disappear too quickly?
I uploaded both files and gave me no mistake, except the flange that is logical.
for the flange speech, you cannot have thickness 0 at that point.
The laser would also make a mistake.
the laser must follow a closed path.
 
try to rebuild it as part and then add the folds, as I usually do.
for the section then, select it first and then add the folds.
be an attempt
 
... then. .
Yes, the "problematic" is that, the profile and way to run it as well.
just opened your file is fine, everything regular. but if I enter into a sketch and define it or change a relationship, on the return part jumps out the notice and misses a fold.
after a "random" series updated list of items and reconstructions return to place, but if I try again to change something it turns again daccapo.

if I model a new part starting from your sketch (copy and paste) the error gives it to me immediately and I solve only suspending and reactivating that missing fold. . It remains the fact that with subsequent modifications to the sketch you will hang again and I have to remake all the correction procedure.

Okay, I'm at sp 0.0, but it's not a justification since it's an old feature that always worked very well. to you does not mai Do you?
What's wrong with you?

that done by me before the corrections:View attachment 22047 how do you open it/see?

greetings
Mar
I open, I find the mistake, I flatten and the error disappears no longer appearing.
I don't have a problem like mike.
It's a very strange mistake, the records might be blown.
if reggio attached the file, it would be much easier to understand.
Try to upgrade to the SP4, maybe they'll fix some things.
I agree in full, maybe a reinstall solves the problem... I worked
with the sp0 but I had no problem with the plates, if not those already
described.
...cut and add flange.. .ps: "edit" of the forum does not disappear too quickly?
Reggio, I answer you as soliduser.
try to rebuild it as part and then add the folds, as I usually do.
for the section then, select it first and then add the folds.
be an attempt
if for this there are many ways, but this is not the problem: the problem
is to understand why the error occurs, is due to sp or malfunction
os/swx?

Monday I will have the opportunity to try on a car with sp0 and I will tell you.
:finger:
 
apart from the flange that is logical.
...swx & "logical"?? ?
...make the flange at 90° instead of 45° and... no mistake... ?
Now I try again at 45° and tomorrow I try to re-ri-do the section on the pc in the office, maybe I also unload the sp4 ... indeed I see that it is "sp4 ev"?? ? then no, thank you, I wait for the sp4.0
 

Attachments

  • logico.webp
    logico.webp
    100.5 KB · Views: 16

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top