linch
Guest
of 100 kg/m an inequality.bhe, 1/1.33 increases the output pair!
while the r4.5 ratio is applied to the conical couple.
for structural reasons the reports should reverse.
of 100 kg/m an inequality.bhe, 1/1.33 increases the output pair!
Thanks marco,put the sections in place; the trees do not dissect. if you want to show the calettamenti with tab (if there are) at the limit do a "breaking line" (the interrupted section in swx).
in adjacent bodies the inclinations of the restraints must be opposite.
always remains that empty space in the box, right of the wheels. You say you have to keep it like this to "respect the length of the trees? can you not squeeze everything and move all right to resume the coupling axis that will have that conical wheel with the respective large external (not present in the drawing)?
greetings
Marco:smile:
between the 2 semi crates I have inserted a membrane (it will be called??), flat seal, of the same form of the 2 contact cases (in the form of 8 to mean us), okay?but a little bigger picture... Can you have it?
maybe a table with 2 odds on the cross, just to understand the size.. .
However, I repeat the board confirmed by hunting.
divide the case in the other way!
then, the flange with the seal for the tree at the top. Why is it so wide? to cost her more?
What did you expect to hold between the two semi-casses?
are the thorns to fit them in?
bearings near crowns should be able to hold axial loads. many times we use qj bearings
in the tree at the top, if the mounting of the crowns is at interference, as it is designed it will be practically impossible to mount the crown on the tree
last (for today), but why do you use seeger to block the bearing? the load is rotating so the ring must be blocked. but blocking it by interference makes it difficult to replace. better to mount it "light" and lock it with washer and screws, for example
Dear exatem, I can't understand what you have taken this impression, I certainly sometimes have slightly "fumantine" reactions, but I assure you that there is no evil intention in my writings. Besides, it's a side of my character that I know and has been living with me forever.I don't know dear linch if you've been bitten lately by a tarantola but frankly you're very far from the user with whom I had exchanged the friendship.
I don't want to think again.:frown:
if possible better fittings because they offer a lower cutting factor than a discharge throat. In fact the bearings are already widely connected (see a catalog of a manufacturer, for example skf: http://www.skf.com/portal/skf/home/products?maincatalogue=1〈=en&newlink=1 )1) on the trees, near the shoulders, is it better to make fittings or exhaust gorges? or some fittings and some gorges?
Yes, the o-rings are mandatory.2) to prevent oil from spilling from inside the carcass, around the various bearings, in addition to the seals (incorporated hinges for the 2 ball bearings, low to left and high to right, lip seals for the others 2), do I have to put o-rings to avoid oil spills between case and lids/vitations?
Thank you hunter!if possible better fittings because they offer a lower cutting factor than a discharge throat. In fact the bearings are already widely connected (see a catalog of a manufacturer, for example skf: http://www.skf.com/portal/skf/home/products?maincatalogue=1〈=en&newlink=1 )
the exhaust gorges usually do if you have to rectify the trees, but in this case you need it? Maybe you can handle a good turning. But if the pro asks why you didn't put the exhaust gorges, you must have the answer ready! :smile:
Yes, the o-rings are mandatory.
Now I have not looked well at your design, but possibly, where the oil touches the tree, sometimes you put a tempered bushing, this for:
a) avoid an early wear of the untreated tree
b) if there is wear, it is better to use a bushing from a few euros than a much more expensive tree.
I'll train you the design of a car that's not a gearbox, but you need to see the oil talk and the tempered bushings. There's no o-ring here because the machine was lubricated with fat (in this case it rotates the outer ring but you care little).
All right, I'd be in your seat for the o-ring in the thickness of the flange instead of the case.Thank you hunter!
I still attach the picture of the detail I meant. I thought I'd put the o-rings where I made the red marks, right?
Okay for tree fittings! :smile:
Okay, more or less:... ...
ok on the suggestions but attention to the axial load of the bearings in general, but especially to those mounted on the axis of the conical couple.All right, I'd be in your seat for the o-ring in the thickness of the flange instead of the case.
Then, but it's my personal habit, these flanges usually make them with a cylindrical male aprte that enters the thickness of the case, and the o-ring I put it in this cylindrical part. so you get rid of any problems of flat surface planar, but it's just a detail (actually the flanges I make them so too because this way I use them to pin the bearing, of course only one of the two you have on the tree otherwise it becomes hyperstatic in axial sense --> overheating, wear, gripping!).
Bye.
1) with regard to the sizing of the tree I am quite convinced, we have been "lively advised" to make it of a length of about 40/50 cm. I also know the empty space, I will ask the professor Tuesday!Okay, more or less:
safe and convinced of conformation/dimensioning? which track you are following; "copy" an existing one or do you according to "general" indications?
is said of the empty space inside the box resulting in unnecessary length of the trees between the supports. then the box seems excessively "sick" (or too tight bearings.. apart from the oscillating one and I don't understand why of that type and only him) especially on the right side (you will tell me that there is the exit with the "force take", but it finds a compromise). I say "to the eye" not knowing all the data for sizing. . I would make it thinner and with the most "floated" bearings inside. in this regard you have to consider the ease of lambirli from the oil, the more they are flush with the inner wall the better.
if it must be "open" along the vertical plane I would do it however turned 90°, with the junction line passing by the axes, cutting half the bearing seats (like the section you did in practice).
The low-out shaft has that conical wheel.. if it is also helical (but not only) you will have axial reaction towards the inside of the reducer and the opposite bearing will not be the simple ball bearing you put but it will take a brace.
about the estates. .
I would not put or under lids but simple "paper" seals. the builders put a veil of dough for seals (like the "red", but for its characteristics in this case it does not serve, there are many types).
the lids would do them with a "labber" that enters centering in the bearing seat (please drown them more as mentioned above) making joke against the same (in this case you will have to predict/size the thickness of the seals if you use those of paper and adjust with axial tolerances). so "flats" as you made them are not the maximum.
lip oil in the lids must have a joke, you cannot keep the same thickness as you did. mount them from the inside of the cover so that they can not be expelled outward.
and yes, the contact surfaces on the shaft should be rectified (as well as, as a rule, those of the bearings) but it is true that the turning today from excellent finishes. . material chosen for the trees? and size?
I don't think of anything else.
Go ahead and see.
greetings
Marco:smile:
As regards the bearings, as I said to sampon, I would not seem presumptuous, but from the calculations carried out also with the help of the skf portal I am being tested for the duration.ok on the suggestions but attention to the axial load of the bearings in general, but especially to those mounted on the axis of the conical couple.
They are combined, therefore they also partially hold axial loads and are verified, but they do not seem to me the maximum for that application.
I would suggest axial roller bearing mounted with a slight preload.
Finally, the mounting of the toothed wheels will be cast? if you with what method? what interference to apply? which method to use for a subsequent replacement?
In this regard I would suggest the skf oil injection staining system, it works wonder.
The operation does not provide any damage to the sewing office (which is fundamental), or to the disassembled element.
That would be the same thing that said to you,5) held:. .
The second part is not clear to me.
... and I think it refers to something like this:These flanges usually make them with a cylindrical male part that enters the thickness of the case, and the o-ring put it in this cylindrical part. so you get rid of any problems of flat surface planar, but it's just a detail (actually the flanges I make them so too because this way I use them to pin the bearing, of course only one of the two you have on the tree otherwise it becomes hyperstatic in axial sense --> overheating, wear, gripping!).
and the or are also good (very well :biggrinIf, in addition to tolerances, you also indicate the coupling diameters, you can try to give you an answer.As regards the bearings, as I said to sampon, I would not seem presumptuous, but from the calculations carried out also with the help of the skf portal I am being tested for the duration.
the dentate wheels are forced on the respective trees with a h7-x7 coupling (can go well? )
Thank you for the answer!
Hi.
steak
tolerance could go well, but check according to the interference obtained, the actual transferable couple and feasibility with heating for the expansion of the hub. Also check compression both the hub and the shaft caused by the tightening of the first on the second after cooling. verify that the temperatures reached do not bring back the materials and therefore lose the mechanical characteristics.the dentate wheels are forced on the respective trees with a h7-x7 coupling (can go well? )
indicated them in the post just above what you linked. .If, in addition to tolerances, you also indicate the coupling diameters, you can try to give you an answer.
Hi.
But how can you use this tone with someone you don't know?indicated them in the post just above what you linked. .
Of course, if you don't read everything for benign then don't complain if "pro." you're begging:tongue::biggrin:
greetings
Marco:smile: